|
1 CD -
RD 77924 - (p) 1991
|
|
MASTERWERKE
FRANZÖSISCHER CEMBALOMUSIK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-Philippe
RAMEAU (1683-1764) |
Pièces
de Clavecin
|
|
|
|
|
- Les
tendres plaintes
|
|
3' 11" |
1 |
|
- La
Follette
|
|
1' 27" |
2 |
|
-
L'Entretien des Muses
|
|
5' 30" |
3 |
|
- Les Tourbillons
|
|
1' 48" |
4 |
|
-
Menuets
|
|
2' 49" |
5 |
|
- Sarabande
|
|
2' 27" |
6 |
|
-
L'Enharmonique
|
|
6' 07" |
7 |
Gaspard LE ROUX (c.1660-c.1707) |
Suite
F-Dur
|
|
|
|
|
- Prélude |
|
1' 16" |
8 |
|
-
Allemande |
|
3' 05" |
9 |
|
- Courante
|
|
1' 30" |
10 |
|
- Menuet |
|
0' 55" |
11 |
|
- Chaconne |
|
3' 54" |
12 |
Pancrace ROYER (1705-1755) |
Pièces
de Clavecin |
|
|
|
|
- Les tendres sentiments
|
|
4' 51" |
13 |
|
- La Majesteuse
|
|
2' 54" |
14 |
|
- La
Sensible |
|
3' 58" |
15 |
Jacques DUPHLY (1715-1789) |
Pièces
de Clavecin |
|
|
|
|
- Courante c-moll
|
|
5' 26" |
16 |
|
-
Menuets c-moll
|
|
3' 27" |
17 |
|
- La
Du Buq
|
|
3' 56" |
18 |
|
- Les
Colombes, Rondeau
|
|
3' 51" |
19 |
|
- La
De Vancanson
|
|
2' 34" |
20 |
|
- La
Pothoüin, Rondeau
|
|
5' 48" |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gustav LEONHARDT,
Cembalo (Nicholas Lefebure, Rouen
1755)
Equal temperament, a = 410 Hz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Lutherse Kerk,
Haarlem (Holland) - 22/23 novembre
1989
|
|
|
Registrazione: live
/ studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Recording
Supervision |
|
Wolf Erichson
|
|
|
Engineer |
|
Stephan Schellmann
(Tritonus/Stuttgart)
|
|
|
Prima Edizione LP |
|
Nessuna
|
|
|
Edizione CD |
|
Deutsche Harmonia
Mundi (BMG) | LC 0761 | RD 77924 |
1 CD - durata 71' 02" | (p) 1991 |
DDD |
|
|
Cover Art
|
|
Heinrich Füger
(Heinrich Friedrich), 1751-1818
"Selbstbildnis des Küstlers mit
seinem Bruder Johann Gottlieb",
c.1769, Berlin (Ost),
Nationalgalerie
|
|
|
Note |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
French
Harpsichord Music -
Rameau, Le Roux, Royer
& Duphly
In
the second half of the 17th
century, when the first
concerts outside court
circles were given in
private houses, professional
musicmaking beyond the
confines of Versailles became
properly organised for the
first time. Well-known
lutenists and
harpsichordists invited
friends, and colleagues (and
soon after members of the
nobility as well) to their
homes, in order to present
an especially gifted singer
or keyboard virtuoso. These
musical ‘soirées’ were
initially organised by the
musicians themselves, but
soon began to be put on by
various noblemen who
regularly frequented the
royal court. In this way,
they were able to introduce
music that they had heard in
private at Versailles to a
wider public. This
development played a central
role in making the
harpsichord repertoire
better known, and was of
such great importance
because music at court went
into a kind of hibernation
after the death of Louis XIV
in 1715, for whom music
represented an essential
enrichment of French
culture. It’s true that his
successor Louis XV did
rehabilitate the musical
tradition at court, but he
proved to be a patron with
considerable shortcomings,
regarding music as something
of merely decorative value.
This situation was
alleviated during the
gradual decline of royal
patronage by two passionate
music-lovers: Le Riche La
Pouplinière - an industrious
government minister who was
wealthy enough to maintain
one of the best orchestras
of Paris, and could afford
the services of composers
and conductors such as
Rameau, Stamitz and Gossec -
and Madame de Pompadour, the
mistress of Louis XV, who
actually put on her own
private concerts, thus
ushering in a new fashion in
Paris which was adopted by
many of the city’s
distinguished families. In
addition, public concerts
were organised for the first
time, with the agreement of
the king: they took the form
of so-called “Concerts
spirituels”, which were
inaugurated in 1725 in the
Jardin des Tuileries near
the Louvre.
While Rameau was in charge
for 22 years of the
orchestra of the financier
La Pouplinière, whose wife
was one of Rameau’s ardent
admirers, the “Concerts
spirituels” were directed
from 1748 to 1762 by his
fellow harpsichordist Royer.
It’s strange that Rameau
wrote hardly anything else
specifically for the
harpsichord, apart from the
“Pièces de clavecin en
concerts” (1741), “La
Dauphine" and the dances for
“Les Indes galantes”, after
he embarked on his career as
an opera composer with the
performance of “Hippolyte et
Ericie” in the house of La
Pouplinière. (At which time
he was already fifty years
old!) Rameauls 65
harpsichord works were
published in four volumes in
1706, 1724, ca. 1726 and
1741. Whereas stylised
dances appropriate to the
music of the Grand
siècle occupied pride
of place in the first
volume, the lion's share of
the suites was taken in the
later volumes by
characteristic genre pieces.
A similar change of
direction, which was coupled
with the adoption of Italian
stylistic elements and in
particular with the influence
of sonata form (the true
counterpart to the suite)
can be observed in the
harpsichord works of
Rameau’s elder colleague,
Francois Couperin.
Rameau’s suites show him to
be a master of the art of
naturalistic
characterisation, as for
example in his rhapsodic
piece “Les Tourbillons": he
described this work in a
letter as a depiction of
“clouds of dust whirled up
by gusts of wind”. Rameau's
more contemplative side
emerges most appealingly in
“L’Entretien des Muses”,
while “L'Enharmonique”
displays striking and daring
chromatics, both bold and
graceful.
The work recorded here cover
some sixty years in the
history of French
harpsichord music, as is
pleasingly illustrated by
the inclusion of the F major
suite by Gaspard Le Roux as
a kind of culmination of the
keyboard tradition of the Grand
siècle. Le Roux is
mentioned in contemporary
literature in the same
breath as Lebègue, Francois
Couperin and D’Anglebert,
and his popularity outside
France is illustrated by a
pirate edition of his
“Pièces“ brought out by
Roger in Amsterdam in 1705.
Le Roux died at roughly the
same time as Rameau was
publishing his first volume
of harpsichord suites. Le
Roux’s “Pièces” consist of
just three works, and they
do not contain any dances.
The preludes seem somewhat
archaic for the time as a
result of their notation in
unrhythmised semibreves,
thus recalling models in the
work of François Couperin’s
uncle Louis. The preludes of
Le Roux, however, are
considerably more simple.
The allemande is stately and
dignified, while the
expansive chaconne seems
very serious, and is full of
rich harmony.
The importance of Nicolas
Pancrace Royer lies first
and foremost in the fact
that, as director of the
“Concerts spirituels”,
he drew the public’s
attention once more to older
works by composers like
Carissimi and Gilles that
had since been forgotten.
However, Royer was also
responsible for significant
innovations in the concert
repertoire, performing works
by composers such as Hasse,
Graun, J.J. Rousseau,
Stamitz and Pergolesi
(“Stabat Mater”). In
addition, he managed to have
the most important new
works, that were hitherto
only played for a select
audience at La Pouplinière's
private concerts, given
again for the general public
in the “Concerts
spirituels”. Royer’s only
surviving collection of
“Pièces de clavecin” dates
from 1746, and contains
music of high quality,
marked by subtle harmonies,
melodies conceived mostly
along vocal lines, and great
liveliness.
In 1754, Friedrich Marpurg
reported that Jacques Duphly
had been a pupil of
Dagincourt, and only played
the harpsichord, in order
not to spoil his hands at
the organ. Duphly gave
lessons to the leading
families of Paris, and was
counted among the city’s
best teachers by the
harpsichord-builder Pascal
Taskin. Together with
Balbastre and Armand-Louis
Couperin, however, Duphly
was to be one of the last
major representatives of a
harpsichord tradition going
back some four hundred
years, and he also had to
witness the glorious end of
his instrument. Duphly died
at the age of 84 on 15th
July 1789 - just one day,
symbolically enough, after
the outbreak of the French
revolution. The populace
soon settled the score with
the ancien régime,
its representatives and its
symbols: the aristocratic
harpsichord was literally to
go up in flames, its place
being taken by the rapidly
advancing fortepiano - the
instrument associated with
the bourgeoisie.
Clemens
Romijn
Translation:
Clive Williams
|
|
|
|