|
1 LP -
SAWT 9538-B - (p) 1968
|
|
5 LPs -
SCA 25022-T/1-5 - (c) 1972 |
|
2 CDs -
8.35778 XD - (c) 1989 |
|
CEMBALOKONZERTE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johann Sebastian
BACH (1685-1750) |
Konzert
für Cembalo A-dur, BWV 1055 -
"Cembalo (con)certato, due Violini, Viola
e Cont."
|
|
13' 31" |
A1 |
|
-
Allegro
|
4' 35" |
|
|
|
- Larghetto
|
4' 43" |
|
|
|
-
Allegro ma non tanto
|
4' 13" |
|
|
|
Konzert
für Cembalo f-moll, BWV 1056 - "Cembalo (con)certato, due Violini,
Viola e Cont." |
|
9' 25" |
A2 |
|
-
Allegro
|
3' 15" |
|
|
|
-
Largo
|
2' 17" |
|
|
|
-
Presto
|
3' 53" |
|
|
|
Konzert
für Cembalo E-dur, BWV 1053 - "Cembalo (con)certato, due Violini,
Viola e Cont." |
|
21' 03" |
B |
|
-
Allegro |
8' 44" |
|
|
|
-
Siciliano |
5' 03" |
|
|
|
-
Allegro |
7' 16" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gustav
LEONHARDT, Cembalo
|
LEONHARDT-CONSORT
mit Originalinstrumenten
- Marie Leonhardt, Antoinette van
den Hombergh, Violine
- Wim ten Have, Viola
- Dijck Koster, Violoncello
- Anthony Woodrow, Baß (BWV 1056, 1053)
- Fred Nijenhuis, Baß (BWV 1055)
Gustav LEONHARDT, Leitung
|
Instrumente:
- Cembalo (Martin Skowroneck, nach J. D.
Dulcken, Antwerpen 1745)
- Violine (Jakob Stainer, Absam 1676)
- Violinen (Klotz, Mittenwald, 18. Jahrh.)
- Viola (Giovanni Tononi, 17. Jahrh.)
- Violoncello (Giovanni Battista [II]
Guadagnini, 1749)
- Baß (deutsch, 19. Jahrh.)
- Baß (deutsch, 18. Jahrh.)
Alle Instrumente in Barockmensur
Stimmung ein Halbton unter normal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Hervormde Kerk,
Bennebroek (Holland) - Dicembre
1967
|
|
|
Registrazione: live
/ studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Producer |
|
Wolf Erichson
|
|
|
Prima Edizione LP |
|
Telefunken "Das Alte
Werk" | SAWT 9538-B | 1 LP -
durata 43' 59" | (p) 1968 | ANA
Telefunken
"Das Alte Werk" | SCA
25022-T/1-5 | 5 LPs - durata
212' 39" | (c) 1972 | ANA | (Sämtliche
Cembalokonzerte)
|
|
|
Edizione CD |
|
Teldec Classics |
LC 3706 | 8.35778 XD | 3 CDs -
durata 76' 42" - 72' 00" - 63'
57" | (c) 1989 | ADD |
(Sämtliche Cembalokonzerte) |
|
|
Cover
|
|
- |
|
|
Note |
|
Oaul Joseph
Delchloche "Hofkonzert in Lüttich"
(Bavarian Narional Museum, Munich)
|
|
|
|
|
Concerto
for harpsichord in A
major, BW V 1055
The A major Concerto,
probably the least known of
all Bach’s solo concertos,
is sure to have been
transcribed, like the F
minor work, from a lost
original (violin concerto in
B major?). (The only
striking feature that is
difficult to fit in with
Bach’s normal technique of
arrangement is the
independent writing of the
continuo [orchestral] bass
and the harpsichord bass.)
In its form it is one of the
simplest, in its content one
of the least characteristic
of Bach’s concertos, so that
the suspicion forces itself
upon us that Bach used as a
pattern a violin concerto by
another master. The first
movement, with its
ritornello theme of
pompously breaking out
broken chords (cf. the
finale of the Double
Concerto BWV 1043 and 1062
respectively) and its
simple, cantabile solo
melody are unusually Italian
in effect, while the Finale,
with its peculiarly
vacillating thematic
material that loses itself
in embellishments in the
style of French overture
melody, is far removed from
all typical finales. The
slow movement is the fullest
of character, a brooding
Siciliano in F sharp minor,
whose broadly curved
cantilenas flow over
chromatic basses with
lamenting suspension
harmonies - a contrast
between outer and inner
movements such as is hardly
to be found so violent in
any other Bach harpsichord
concerto.
Concerto
for harpsichord in F
minor, BWV 1056
The F minor Concerto is in
all probability the
rearrangement of a lost
violin concerto that was
presumably
in G minor. It is more
likely to have been by Bach
himself than by Vivaldi or
some other Italian (as has
been
variously assumed), since
Bach already used the middle
movement around 1729
(transcribed for oboe and
strings
and in F major) as the
Sinfonia to his Cantata No.
156 “Ich steh mit einem Fuß
am Grabe”. That the original
was at any rate intended for
a melodic instrument such as
the oboe or violin is
clearly shown by the
“cantabile”
themes of its movements and
the constantly “cantabile”
-figurative melodic style of
the solo part even in the
harpsichord transcription.
It is also consistent with
this that the left hand of
the harpsichord is confined,
at least
in the outer movements,
almost entirely to doubling
the bass of the tutti. The
work is more simple in its
form
and comparatively more
conventional than the
previous concerto, but on
the other hand almost still
more
concentrated in its thematic
work. Its original
conception for a melodic
instrument leads to the
polyphony and
thematic work being
concentrated almost entirely
on the tutti, and its
character being
distinguished above all
by broadly curved melodic
lines rich in leading notes
and chromaticism which,
together with the dense
thematic
work, the strong
accentuation of full-bar
rhythmic motifs and not
least the sombre basic key,
give the work a
very earnest, almost defiant
spirit. Rhythmic formulas,
particularly the ever
returning, ever newly
circumscribed
and usually dactyllically
extended initial motif
already dominate the
remarkably condensed first
movement,
which in its form is almost
a regular Italian concerto
movement. Its figurative
soli, however, continually
have
developments of individual
tutti motifs (sequential
treatment, partial
repetitions, continuations)
superimposed
upon them, so that the
entire movement seems like
one long development of the
ritornello theme-a
development filled with
almost repelling
seriousness. The A flat.
major Largo, which leads
into the Finale through an
imperfect cadence, is
peculiarly Italian in effect
with its luxuriantly
embellished, inexhaustibly
flowing solo
cantilena to a serenade-like
pizzicato accompaniment of
the tutti, and it forms an
idyllic contrast to the
stern
earnest of the outer
movements. The Finale also
links up outwardly with the
Italian type of finale in
its
3/8 time, but it transforms
the carefree, dance-like
spirit of such movements
into darkly agitated
rhythmic
energy. In its form, the
movement is very similar to
the first, just as the
structure of the tutti
ritornello is
closely linked to the
opening movement, in its
form and even in details of
the motifs. The technique of
playing
down the tutti - soli
contrast through constant
thematic work is hardly less
developed than there, and
even
takes greater possession of
the solo instrument,
particularly in the mighty
quaver chords which - in
full-bar
and altogether abrupt
rhythms as in the first
movement - repeatedly
interrupt even the
ritornello repetitions
right till the end and
charge them with dramatic
agitation.
Concerto
for harpsichord in E
major, BWV 1053
If the A major Concerto is
one of Bach’s “lesser” solo
concertos, its sister-work
in E major is one of the
composer’s biggest (and
best-known), not in
dimensions alone either. It
was evidently not written,
as is usually
assumed, as an original
composition for the
harpsichord, but as a
transcription of a concerto
some ten years
older that was probably
composed for a melody
instrument. At least the
fact speaks for this that
all three
movements already appear in
a first transcription in
cantatas of the year 1726:
the first and second as
Sinfonia
and Aria (both with obligato
organ) in BWV 169 “Gott soll
allein mein Herze haben”,
the third as Sinfonia
(likewise with obligato
organ) in BWV 49 “Ich geh
und suche mit Verlangen”.
Since Bach hardly had
occasion
to write harpsichord
concertos before 1726, the
basis for these cantata
movements will sooner have
been a
Köthen violin concerto -
unless of course one assumes
that the cantata movements
were the original
composition
itself, from which Bach
“extracted” the concerto in
the later Leipzig years and
rewrote it for harpsichord.
In its form, the work is
perhaps the most progressive
of all the master’s
harpsichord concertos -
similar to the
F minor Concerto in the
concentration of the
thematic work, but amazingly
closely approaching the
later
sonata form in its outer
movements. In its character,
it is at the same time one
of the most amiable and most
rich in nuances, which is
again connected with this
formal speciality. Hardly
any other concerto of Bach’s
colours the thematic
material of the outer
movements, together with
their thematic and
concertante treatment, in
such variety, illuminates
them harmonically so
colourfully and subtley, and
hardly any other has such
a powerfully surging,
emphatic middle movement as
the C sharp minor Siciliano,
which stylizes the
traditional
Siciliano idiom up to a
higher plane of majesty.
Again, hardly any other is
so written for fullness of
sound
and harpsichord brilliance -
most strikingly in the
Finale, which has been
rearranged most drastically
and most
suitably for the harpsichord
in comparison with the organ
version.
Ludwig
Finscher
|
|
|
|