|
1 CD -
463 257-2 - (p) 2000
|
|
GUSTAV MAHLER
(1860-1911) |
|
|
|
|
|
Symphonie
No. 4 |
53' 32" |
|
-
Bedächtig. Nicht eilen |
15' 17" |
|
-
In gemächlicher Bewegung. Ohne Hast |
9' 31" |
|
-
Ruhevoll (Poco adagio) |
20' 00" |
|
-
Sehr behaglich "Wir
genießen die himmlischen
Freuden" |
8'
44" |
|
|
|
|
Juliane Banse,
Soprano |
The Cleveland
Orchestra
|
|
|
Pierre Boulez,
Conductor |
|
|
|
|
|
Luogo
e data di registrazione |
|
Masonic
Auditorium, Cleveland (USA) -
aprile 1998 |
|
|
Registrazione:
live / studio |
|
studio |
|
|
Executive
Producers |
|
Dr.
Marion Thiem / Roger Wright
|
|
|
Recording Producer |
|
Christian
Gansch |
|
|
Tonmeister
(Balance Engineer) |
|
Ulrich
Vette |
|
|
Recording Engineer |
|
Reinhard
Lagemann |
|
|
Editing |
|
Johannes
Müller |
|
|
Prima Edizione LP |
|
nessuna |
|
|
Prima Edizione CD |
|
Deutsche
Grammophon - 463 257-2 - (1 CD) -
durata 53' 32" - (p) 2000 - DDD |
|
|
Note |
|
Cover:
August Macke, Städtisches
Kunstmuseum Bonn.
|
|
|
|
|
In February
1892, after 18
totally unproductive months,
Mahler
abandoned his already
wellestablisbed habit of
composing only during the
summer months and, even
though the Hamburg opera
season was still in full
swing, began writing music
again. To his sister, who
had just sent him Arnim`s
and Brentano’s three-volume
anthology of poetry he wrote
in a vein of newfound
self-eonfidence:
"I now have the Wunderhorn
in my hands. With that
self-knowledge which is
natural to creators, I can
add that once again the
result will be worthwhile!"
Within barely a month Mahler
had completed four "Humoresques"
for voice and orchestra that
were later to form part of
his much larger collection
of orchestral Wunderhorn
songs. The fifth
"Humoresque", Das
Himmlische Leben, was
initially intended to form
part of the monumental Third
Symphony (1895-96). But
Mahler became conscious of
the exceptional wealth of
material that the song
contained and decided to use
it as the final movement of
another symphony, which
likewise was initially
described as a "humoresque".
In
this way, Das himmlische
Leben became the
culmination ofthe new work
for which Mahler
first drew up a sort of
synopsis of the different
movements:
1. Die
Welt als ewige Jetztzeit
(The World as Eternal
Present). in G major
2. Das irdische Leben
(Earthly Life), in E flat
minor
3. Caritas (Adagio),
in B major
4. Morgenglocken
(Morning Bells), in F major
5. Die Welt ohne Schwere
(The World without Gravity),
in D major (Scherzo)
6. Das himmlische Leben
(Heavenly Life), in G major
This plan was to develop
considerably: Morgenglocken
was taken over into the
Third Symphony, Das
irdische Leben was
taken up into the collection
of orchestral Wunderorn
settings, while the Scherzo
in D major is undoubtedly
identical to the movement
that Mahler later inserted
into his Fifth Symphony. The
Adagio of the present
symphony might well
have originally been
subtitled “Caritas”, but it
is in G major, not B major.
Not only was it rare for
Mahler to change the
tonality of a movement once
it had been planned, but the
same title was to reappear
several years later in the
initial outline of the
Eighth Symphony.
It was in July 1899 that
Mahler began work on the
actual symphony, at Aussee,
a small spa in the
Salzkarnmergut. The final
weeks of his vacation there
were spent in a state of
feverish activity - his
powers of musical invention
became increasingly fertile
as the fateful hour of his
return to Vienna approached.
On his many long walks he
carried a sketchbook with
him. but after his return to
Vienna he put the sketches
from his mind until the next
summer.
The
following year,
1900,
Mahler
arrived in a state of
exhaustion and depression
at his new summer house
in Maiernigg,
a tiny village on the Wörthersee
in Carinthia; but as soon
as he reimmersed himself
in the previous year’s
sketches, he realized to
his amazement that
throughout his long period
of creative inactivity a "second
self" had been working
unconsciously. As a
result, the work was far
more advanced than it had
been when he broke off the
previous year, so that the
Fourth Symphony could now
be completed in record
time - only a little over
three weeks. Mahler put
the finishing touches to
the manuscript on 6 August
1900.
Beside himself
with happiness, he could
not stop talking about his
work and commenting on it
to his closest friends,
underlining the
unprecedented complexity
of the polyphonic writing
and his elaborate handling
of the development
sections.
Whereas, in the case of
his earlier symphonies, Mahler
had provided his listeners
with explanatory
introductions, or at least
given titles to their
individual movements,
listeners to the Fourth
Symphony were not provided
with a text of any kind,
except for the poem set to
music in the final
movement. What, then, was
he trying to express in
his new
work? In
1901
he described the Adagio,
with its "divinely
gay and deeply sad"
melody, in the following
terms: "St.
Ursula herself, the most
serious of all the saints,
presides with a smile.
Somewhat later he compared
the whole work to a
primitive painting, with a
gold background, and
described the final
movement in particular:
“When man, now
full of wonder, asks what
all this means, the child
answers him with the
fourth movement: 'This
is Heavenly life'.”
1.
Bedächtig.
Nicht eilen - Recht
gemächlich
(Deliberately.
Unhurriedly - Very
leisurely)
A few bars of
introduction, in which the
flutes and sleighbells
predominate, lead into the
first movement proper. The
initial ascending theme,
typically Viennese in
character, belongs to a
larger family of similar
melodies in Mahler's
works; it is followed
shortly by a second theme
on the lower strings that
is as calm as it is
pastoral in nature. But
such simplicity is soon
belied by a development
section in which the
different motifs are
combined, linked together,
transformed and
inextricably intertwined
or, in the words of Erwin
Stein, “shuffled like a
pack of cards”.
2. In gemächlicher
Bewegung. Ohne Hast
(At a leisurely pace.
Unhurriedly)
A shadow hangs over this
Scherzo in ländler
rhythm: the shrill sound
of a retuned violin (each
of its strings is tuned a
whole tone higher) invests
these pages with a
suggestion of parody,
although it is clear by
the end of the movement
that, as Mahler himself
explained, “it wasn't
meant so seriously after
all”.
Originally, Mahler
had headed this movement:
“Death strikes tip the
dance for us; she scrapes
her fiddle bizarrely and
leads tis up to heaven.”
3. Ruhevoll
(Calm). Poco Adagio
With the third
movement we penetrate to
the essence of Mahler`s
music and, one could
almost say, of his soul.
No other composer writing
in the Beethovenian
tradition could have
created music so serene,
so serious and so
profound. Mahler
was right to remark that
this movement “laughs and
cries at the same time”,
since the opening theme,
motionless and meditative
with its passacaglia bass,
is followed by a second
theme that is openly
anguished in character.
What follows are two
distinct groups of
variations on the main
theme separated by a
return of the second,
anguished, theme. The
coda, which is in E major,
announces the principal
motif of the final
movement, its sudden
modulation unleashing the
symphony's
only genuinely loud tutti
and throwing open the
gates of perhaps the only
paradise accessible to the
living - the naive
paradise of childhood and
popular imagery.
4. Sehr behaglich
(Very contentedly)
In the Wunderhorn
poem Das himmlische
Leben, Heaven's
bucolic pleasures -
musical and, above all,
gastronomic - are
described and catalogued with
a verve, enthusiasm and
precision that delighted Mahler.
He enjoined the soprano
soloist to adopt "a
joyful, childlike
expression completely
devoid of parody".
His contemporaries found
this naivety singularly
false and affected. To
today's listeners it seems
inconceivable that this
lovely song, so fresh and
pure and so astonishingly
rich in melodic invention,
should have been so badly
received by almost all its
early audiences. The
luminous, radiant, sublime
coda in E major -
“heavenly” music if ever
there was - leaves us
wholly convinced that "no
music on earth can compare
with that of the heavenly
spheres".
In
writing the Fourth
Symphony, Mahler
hoped to offer his
contemporaries a work that
would be both shorter and
more accessible than his
previous symphonies. He
dispensed with vast
orchestral forces and, in
particular, with
trombones, forcing himself
to invest the writing with
the clarity, economy and
transparency plainly
demanded by the
subject-matter of the
symphony. The symphony
received its first
performance in Munich
on 25
November 1901 under the
composer’s own direction.
The audience, expecting
another titanic work from
a composer noted for his
love of monumentality,
could not believe their
ears. Such innocence and
naivety could only be
more posturing on his
part, they felt, not to
say an example of
deliberate mystification.
The performance was
roundly booed.
Shortly afterwards, Felix
Weingartner conducted the
work in Frankfurt,
Nuremberg, Karlsruhe and
Stuttgart. Mahler
himself conducted the
first performances in
Berlin and Vienna. On each
occasion he was accused of
"posing insoluble
problems", "amusing
himself by using thematic
material alien to his
nature",
"taking
pleasure in shattering the
eardrums of his audiences
with atrocious and
unimaginable cacophonies"
and of being incapable of
writing anything other
than stale and insipid
music, lacking in style
and melody, music which,
artificial and hysterical,
was a “medley” of
"symphonic cabaret acts”.
History teaches us that
many great composers were
similarly reviled by their
contemporaries. Yet it
must be admitted that a
paradox lay at the heart
of the Fourth Symphony:
the contrast between the
reassuring surface and the
compositional tcchnique
beneath it was bound to be
disconcerting.
Behind the deliberate
simplicity and relatively
modest orchestration lie a
wealth of invention,
a polyphonic density and a
concentration of musical
ideas: an almost dizzying
complexity and a technical
sophistication that are
without precedent in Mahler`s
oeuvre. For its time, the
Fourth Symphony was an
avant-garde work, a form of
self-discovery for the
composer himself, which
brought an entirely
unexpected evolution in his
style towards greater rigour
and concentration. In
his "return
to Haydn", Mahler certainly
borrowed traditional
formulas from the past, but
he enriched and transformed
them constantly, with
inexhaustible imagination.
Nor has his “irrational and
unreasonable gaiety”
anything counterfeit about
it. The prevailing mood is
that of an affectionate
nostalgia for better times,
for an "age
of innocence", yet another
reason why the Fourth
Symphony remains the most
authentically Viennese
of all Mahler`s
works.
Henry-Louis
de La Grange
|
|
|